In vitro Comparison of the adhesive strength of the etch and rinse adhesive systems and self etching

Authors

  • Hildrex Evans Vargas Robles Universidad Alas Peruanas filial Cusco, Perú.
  • Elvis Efraín Miranda Cordova Universidad Alas Peruanas filial Cusco, Perú.
  • Liceth Lazo Otazú Universidad Alas Peruanas filial Cusco, Perú.
  • Herbert Cosio Dueñas Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad, Cusco, Perú.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59334/ROV.v1i30.135

Keywords:

Adhesive strength, adhesion to enamel, adhesives. (DeSC)

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to compare in vitro the adhesive strength of the Etch and Rinse systems of the 4th and 5th generation; and Self Etch systems of the 6th and 7th generation. A descriptive, comparative study was carried out. Twenty third molars were used for this study, (these molars were extracted for orthodontic and prophylactic purposes). Each teeth were cut into two pieces obtaining 40 pieces in total, then they were chosen randomly of which 10 pieces were cut with the 4th generation adhesive strength, 10 with the 5th generation, 10 with the 6th generation and 10th with the 7th generation of the adhesive. A vertical traction test was performed, measured in kilograms force, and then transformed into megapascals (Mpa).

The 4th generation resins obtained an adhesive resistance of 29.9 Mpa, the 5th generation resins obtained a resistance of 16.9 Mpa, the 6th generation obtained a resistance of 27.5 Mpa and the 7th generation obtained a resistance of 11.0 Mpa. The results were subjected to normality tests using the Shapiro Wilk test. These results were analyzed using the oneway ANOVA, finding statistically significant differences between the four study groups with a p-value of 0.001. As a conclusion; the 4th generation adhesive system classified as Etch and Rinse showed better adhesive strength, followed by the 6th generation adhesive system classified as Self Etch.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Correa, B., & Andrés, N. (2011). Resistencia adhesiva de restauraciones de resina compuesta sobre bases de ionómero vítreo sometidas a dos tratamientos acondicionadores distintos. Repositorio Académico - Universidad de Chile. Recuperado a partir de http://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/133452

Cosio, H., Abanto, M., & Lazo, L. (2016). Estudio in vitro de la resistencia adhesiva a dentina de dos resinas fluidas para restauración. Ciencia y Desarrollo, 19(2), 13-18. https://doi.org/10.21503/cyd.v19i2.1297

Garrido González, R. (2008). Estudio comparativo in vitro de la resistencia adhesiva de resina compuesta sobre dos diferentes orientaciones de los túbulos dentinarios. Repositorio Académico - Universidad de Chile. Recuperado a partir de http://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/137866

Maldonado Araya, F. A. (2014). Análisis comparativo in vitro de la resistencia adhesiva de restauraciones de resina compuesta utilizando el adhesivo Peak® Universal Bond con y sin grabado ácido previo de superficie. Universidad de Chile. Recuperado a partir de http://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/130510

Meza Juárez, M. L. (2016). Comparación in vitro de la resistencia adhesiva de un cemento autoadhesivo con diferentes tipos de tratamientos previos a la superficie dentinaria.

Moncada, G., Vildósola, P., Fernandez, E., Estay, J., Junior, de O., B, O., … Martin, J. (2015). INCREASED LONGEVITY OF RESINS BASED COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS AND THEIR ADHESIVE BOND. A LITERATURE REVIEW. Revista Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Antioquia, 27(1), 127-153. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.v27n1a7

Monsalves Bravo, S. I., Terrazas Soto, P., Toro Urbina, G., & Bader Mattar, M. (2014). Evaluación del grado de sellado marginal y resistencia adhesiva de restauraciones de resina compuesta con adhesivo convencional en dentición primaria y definitiva. Revista Clínica de Periodoncia, Implantología y Rehabilitación Oral, 7(3), 149-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.piro.2014.09.001

Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials - 12th Edition. (s. f.). Recuperado 21 de febrero de 2018, a partir de https://www.elsevier.com/books/phillips-science-of-dental-materials/anusavice/978-1-4377-2418-9

Published

2019-06-01

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

In vitro Comparison of the adhesive strength of the etch and rinse adhesive systems and self etching. (2019). Odontología Vital, 1(30), 45-50. https://doi.org/10.59334/ROV.v1i30.135

Similar Articles

1-10 of 27

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.