Sorption of moisture and resistance to acid dissolution of two restoration glass ionomers: in vitro study

Authors

  • Herbert Cosio Dueñas Universidad Nacional San Antonio Abad del Cusco
  • Gladys García Sánchez Universidad Alas Peruanas
  • Liceth Lazo Otazú Universidad Nacional San Antonio Abad del Cusco

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59334/ROV.v2i33.401

Keywords:

Dental cements, glass ionomer, solubility, dental materials, acid erosion, DeSC

Abstract

Introduction: Glass Ionomer has certain clinical disadvantages, such as fragility and moisture sensitivity, which might reduce the restauration´s lifespan. This effects, such as water absorption and acid solubility may damage the restauration, cause fracture and marginal filtration, this could trigger cavity relapse and the loss of the correct mechanical properties.

Objective: Compare in vitro moisture sorption and acid solution of two restoration ionomers.

Method: 20 samples of Ketac molar glass ionomer and 20 of Fuji II were made. A first weight measurement was made with precision scales, obtaining an initial weight. The specimens were submerged in distilled water for 24 hours, stored in a heater; Each sample was weighed with a precision balance, establishing the percentage of moisture absorbed from the initial weight. Subsequently, the samples were submerged in 3% citric acid solution for 24 hours, to be re-weighed, evaluating the loss of material due to erosive action of the acid in percentage of weight.

Conclusions: The moisture sorption by weight was 2.59% in the molar ketac and 1.45% in the Fuji II; When comparing the samples using the t-test, statistically significant differences were obtained. The percentage of material loss due to erosive action of the acid was 10.81% for molar Ketac and 18.62% for Fuji II; When comparing the samples using the t-test, statistically significant differences were obtained. It was concluded that the moisture sorption was higher in the molar Ketac and the greatest solubility to the action of citric acid was Fuji II.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Basurto, K. E., & Barragán, N. C. (2016). Comparison of the dental leakage between Ketac™ Molar e Ionofil Molar® with centrix and ART spatula. CES Odontología, 29(2), 5-11.

Blanco, S., Frías, S., Tarón, A., Bustillo, J. M., & Díaz, A. (2017). Resistencia a la compresión del ionómero de vidrio y de la resina compuesta. Estudio in vitro. Revista odontológica mexicana, 21(2), 109-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rodmex.2017.05.006

Bohner, L. O. l, & Prates, L. H. M. (2018). Compressive Strength of a Glass Ionomer Cement Under the Influence of Varnish Protection and Dietary Fluids. Odovtos International Journal of Dental Sciences, 20(3), 61-69. https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2018.33607

Casamayou, R., Boghosian, E. D., & Abella, R. (2016). Comportamiento de los sellantes de vidrio ionomero de alta densidad. Estudio a 6 años. Actas Odontológicas, 13(2), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2018.33607

Cosio, H., Zuñiga, G., & Zvietcovich, M. (2015). Comparación in vitro de las propiedades físico—Químicas de un ionómero de vidrio convencional, un cermet y un ionómero de vidrio modificado con aleación para amalgamp. Ciencia y Desarrollo, 18(2), 13-18. https://doi.org/10.21503/cyd.v18i2.1227

Delgado, C. R., Ramírez, J. P., & Nagano, A. Y. (2014). Liberación de fluoruro de dos cementos de ionómero de vidrio: Estudio in vitro. Revista odontológica mexicana, 18(2), 84-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1870-199X(14)72056-7

Hernández, R., Moraga, R., Velásquez, M., & Gutiérrez, F. (2013). Resistencia compresiva vidrio ionómero Ionofil Molar® y Vitremer® según tiempo de exposición en saliva artificial. Revista clínica de periodoncia, implantología y rehabilitación oral, 6(2), 75-77. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0719-01072013000200005

Jiménez, A., & Yamamoto, A. (2015). Valoración de la microfiltración del ionómero de vidrio mejorado (Ketac Molar Easymix ®) con o sin el uso de acondicionador. Revista odontológica mexicana, 19(3), 170-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rodmex.2015.07.003

Matick, A. C. C., Navarro, C. H., Higashi, D. T., Pascotto, R. C., Fujimaki, M., & Terada, R. S. S. (2019). Avaliação da solubilidade e sorção em água de alguns materiais restauradores diretos. Revista de Odontologia da UNESP, 48, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.12818

Piedra, L. A., Ariza, M. C., Guzmán, H. J., & Zárate, F. (2016). COMPARISON OF DEBONDING RESISTANCE AND FAILURE TYPE OF THREE ORTHODONTIC BAND CEMENTS. Revista Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Antioquia, 28(1), 95-111. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.v28n1a5

Ríos, E., Garcilazo, A., Guerrero, J., Meade, I., & Miguelena Muro, K. (2017). Estudio comparativo de la resistencia al desplazamiento de cuatro cementos en zirconia. Revista odontológica mexicana, 21(4), 235-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rodmex.2018.01.003

Rudloff, K., Haristoy, R., & Velásquez, M. (2014). Permanencia de Restauraciones Oclusales Realizadas con Técnica Restaurativa Atraumática (TRA) en Dientes Permanentes. International journal of odontostomatology, 8(1), 53-58. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-381X2014000100006

ŞiŞmanoŞlu, S. (2019). Fluoride Release of Giomer and Resin Based Fissure Sealants. Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences, 21(2), 45-52. https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.v21i2.36860

Taboada, M. F., Obando, P. C., Armas, A. del C., Jácome, A., & Flores, D. (2018). Grado de degradación de ionómeros de vidrio modificados con resina al contacto con diferentes enjuagues bucales: Estudio in vitro. Odontología Vital, 28, 15-24. https://doi.org/10.59334/ROV.v1i28.157

Taron, A., Frías, S., Blanco, S., Camacho, A., Bustillo, J. M., & Díaz, A. (2015). Comparación de la dureza superficial de diferentes tipos de materiales restauradores en premolares birradiculares, un estudio in vitro. Avances en Odontoestomatología, 31(6), 355-361. https://doi.org/10.4321/S0213-12852015000600003

Verón, M. G., Suárez, S. G., & Prado, M. O. (2018). Estudio de los cambios de la composición química de un ionómero vítreo mediante la técnica de PIXE. Matéria (Rio de Janeiro), 23(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-707620180002.0425

Published

2020-12-11

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Sorption of moisture and resistance to acid dissolution of two restoration glass ionomers: in vitro study. (2020). Odontología Vital, 2(33), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.59334/ROV.v2i33.401

Similar Articles

1-10 of 192

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.