Self-tie systems. Clinic case

Authors

  • Gema Esmeralda García López Centro de Estudios Superiores de Ortodoncia, México.
  • Beatriz Gurrola Martínez Facultad de Estudios Superiores Zaragoza UNAM, México.
  • Adán Casasa A. Center for Advanced Orthodontic Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59334/ROV.v2i27.212

Keywords:

Class II, cross bite, moderated crowding, Trainer

Abstract

Today, orthodontics plays a very important role in the lives of patients. There is many orthodontic systems market trying to orthodontic treatment faster, convenient and effective. The self ligating system will revolutionize orthodontics because it is a thought system patient comfort and reduce time reducing friction. The treatment time is a key factor, because it can provide stability post retention, even when there has been short. A 21 years old female patient is presented with a skeletal class II, hyperdivergent, molar and canine bilateral class I, anterior open bite, second right premolar in crossbite, canines outside arc, moderated upper crowding and light lower crowding. Deviated lower midline 0.5 mm to left, widespread enamel hipoplasia. Third molars absent. She underwent in alignment, leveling, stripping, detailing and retention treatment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Reincheneder, C., Baumert, U., Gedrange, T., Proffit, P., Faltermeier, A., Muessing, D. (2007) Friccional properties of aesthetic brackets. The European Journal of orthodontics 08/; 29 (4): 359-65. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjm033

Maen Zreaqat and Rozita Hassan (2011). Self-Ligating Brackets: An Overview, Principles in Contemporary Or-thodontics, Dr. Silvano Naretto (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-307-687-4, InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/20285

Harradine N, Birnie D. (1996) The clinical use of activa self ligating brackets AJODO;109:319-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70155-5

Sathler, R., Goncalves, R., Janson, G., Castello, N., Zanda, M. (2011) Demystifying self ligating brackets. Dental press J orthod. 16;2:50 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2176-94512011000200006

Prettymana, C., Bestb, A., Lindauerc, S., Tufekcid, E. (2012) Self-ligating vs conventional brackets as perceived by orthodontists. The Angle Orthodontist: November, Vol. 82, No. 6, pp. 1060-1066. https://doi.org/10.2319/101311-640.1

Eldin, N., Fayed, M., Eid, F., Mostafa, Y. (2015) Do self ligating bracket systems produce actual alveolar bone expan-sión?. IOSR-JDMS;14:8 45-53

Wilches, L., García, D., Quintero, L., De los Reyes, A., Aranza, M., Otero, L. (2014) Comparacion de la respuesta biológica generada por dos sistemas de brackets convencioinales y de autoligado. Univ odontol. ;33(70): 21-29.

Atik, E., Ciger, S. (2014) An assessment of conventional and self-ligating brackets in class I maxillary constriction patients. Angle Orthod.;84:615-622. https://doi.org/10.2319/093013-712.1

Orozco, A., Silva, R. (2011) Fuerza friccional en brackets de autoligado pasivo. Revista latinoamericana de orto-doncia y ortopedia. Abril. https://www.ortodoncia.ws

Rinchuse D, Miles P. (2007) Self ligating brackets: present and future. AJODO;132:216-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.06.018

Downloads

Published

2017-12-01

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Self-tie systems. Clinic case. (2017). Odontología Vital, 2(27), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.59334/ROV.v2i27.212

Similar Articles

1-10 of 25

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.