Comparison of thickness and homogeneity of the cementation layer in indirect veneers, made with fluid resin vs. light-cure resin cement: in vitro study

Authors

  • Carolina Manríquez Universidad Andrés Bello, Chile.
  • Francisca Tranamil Universidad Andrés Bello, Chile.
  • Pablo Vargas Universidad Andrés Bello, Chile.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59334/ROV.v1i30.139

Keywords:

Flowable Resin, Cementation, Polymerization, Indirect Veneers

Abstract

Objective: Compare the thickness and homogeneity of the cementing layer between a light-cure resin cement and a flowable resin.

Materials and methods: To obtain the sample, the preparation was carved in a replica of tooth 1.1 (EWL model teeth, Kavo), which was scanned and then replicated 92 times in an ABS polymer by 3D printing. The sample was divided into 2 groups with 46 samples each. The cementation of the veneers was performed with Tetric N-Flow flowable resin in the G1 group, and with Variolink Esthetic light-cure resin cement in the G2 group. Each sample was previously washed with 70° alcohol, then dried and a layer of Tetric N-Bond was applied. Digital pressure was used to achieve the final settlement of the veneers. Finally, a medial and a paramedial section were made to obtain approximately 2 mm thick samples. The cementation layer was observed with an optical microscope.

Results: The average thickness for Tetric N-Flow was 119μm in incisal, 113μm in medium and 107μm in cervical. For Variolink Esthetic the average was 117μm, 112μm and 110μm in incisal, middle and cervical respectively. The homogeneity was 93.3% for G1 and 91.3% for G2.

Conclusion: There is no significant difference in the thickness and homogeneity of the cementing layer made with flowable resin and with light-cure resin cement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aranda N, Aizencop D, Ehrmantraut M. (2013). Comparación de la profundidad de fotopolimerización de resinas fluidas a través de 4 porcelanas de alta opacidad. Rev. Clin. Periodoncia Implantol. Rehabil. Oral ; 6: 123-126. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0719-01072013000300004

Díaz-Romeral, P.; Orejas Pérez, J.; López, E.; Veny, T. (2009). Cementado adhesivo de restauraciones totalmente cerámicas. Cient Dent ; 1:137- 151.

Freedman, G. (2012). Contemporary esthetic dentistry. Canada, Elsevier. 1° edición, Cap 16: 436 – 468. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-06895-6.00041-4

Marghalani, H. (2012). Sorption and solubility characteristics of self adhesive resin cements. Dental materials 28: 187 – 198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.037

Nguyen, J. Migonney, V. Dorin, N. Sadoun, M. (2012). Resine composite blocks via high-pressure high-temperature polymerization. Dental materials ; 28: 529 – 534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.12.003

O. Sagsoz, N.Ilday, O. Karatas, M. Cayabatmaz, H. Parlak, M. Olmez, S. Demirbuga. (2016). The bond strength of highly filled flowable composites placed in two different configuration factors. Journal of Conservative Dentistry, 19: 21- 25. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.173188

P. Magne, U. Belser. (2004). Restauraciones de porcelana adherida en los dientes anteriores: método biomiméticos. Cap. 8, pág. 335 – 370.

P. Magne, U. Belser. (2004). Restauraciones de porcelana adherida en los dientes anteriores: método biomimético. Cap. 4, pág. 129-178.

Pavesi, N. Henrique, F. Alves, D. Lovadino, J. Sano, R. Correa, R. (2012). Advanced in dental veneres: materials, applications, and techniques. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent ; 4: 9 – 16. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S7837

S. Nandini. (2010). Invited Review. Indirect resin composites. Journal of Conservative Dentistry ; 13: 184-194. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.73377

Sampaio, C. Barbosa, J. Cáceres, E. Rigo, L. Coelho, P. Bonfante, E. Hirata, R. (2017). Volumentric shrinkage and film thickness of cementation materials for veneers: An in vitro 3D microcomputed tomography analysis. The journal of prosthetic dentristry ; 117: 784 – 791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.029

Samuelsson, R. Van Dijken, J. (2013). Microinvasive tooth preparation for bonded ceramic restorations. Am J Esthet Dent ; 3: 112 - 123. https://doi.org/10.11607/ajed.0061

Stamatacos, C. Simon, J. (2013). Cementation of indirect restorations: an overview of resin cements. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry Jour ; 34: 42 – 46.

Tirlet, G. Crescenzo, H. Crescenzo, D. Bazos, P. (2014). Creramic adhesive restorations and biomimetic dentistry: Tissue preservation and adhesion. The international journal of esthetic dentistry 9: 354 – 368.

Zenny, L. Pisani-Proenca, J. Guilherme, M. Andrade, F. Mieko, E. Del Castillo, R. (2008). Restauraciones indirectas de composite: conceptos generales y propuesta clínica de utilización. Quintessence publicación internacional de odontología 1: 1 – 7.

Published

2019-06-01

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Comparison of thickness and homogeneity of the cementation layer in indirect veneers, made with fluid resin vs. light-cure resin cement: in vitro study. (2019). Odontología Vital, 1(30), 65-72. https://doi.org/10.59334/ROV.v1i30.139

Similar Articles

1-10 of 16

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.