Concordance in the estimation of space requirements in orthodontics: Tanaka Index vs Cone Beam

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59334/ROV.v1i44.676

Keywords:

Analysis of Tanaka and Johnston, CBCT, mixed dentition, unerupted teeth, space

Abstract

Introduction: in orthodontics, the initial diagnosis is essential for proper planning, with model analysis being one of the key components. Among the important measurements evaluated is the required space, defined as the area needed in the maxilla for the eruption of permanent teeth. Objective: This study aimed to determine the agreement between the Tanaka Índex and Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in estimating the required space for the eruption of canines and premolars in the upper maxilla, in patients from the Orthodontics and Dentomaxillary Orthopedics postgraduate program at Universidad Andrés Bello. Methodology: a total of 22 patients treated between 2020 and 2024 were evaluated, revealing differences between the two methods. Results: The Tanaka Índex showed a tendency to overestimate the required space, providing more homogeneous results that were less tailored to the individual characteristics of each patient. In contrast, CBCT exhibited greater variability, suggesting it to be a more accurate and personalized method for orthodontic planning. The agreement between the methods was low, with values of 0.29 on the right side and 0.33 on the left side. Conclusion:  the CBCT proved to be a more reliable tool in cases requiring greater precision to avoid unnecessary interventions. However, its higher cost and radiation exposure warrant careful consideration based on the specific needs of each patient. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barrachina, C. M. (1988). Etiopatogenia: Factores Generales [Revisión de Etiopatogenia: Factores Generales]. En Ortodoncia clínica y terapéutica (pp. 369–388). Salvat Editores.

Canut, J. A. (1988). Mordida Abierta [Revisión de Mordida Abierta]. En Ortodoncia clínica y terapéutica (pp. 369-388). Salvat Editores.

Donaire, F., Villalón, J., Navarro, P., & Ugalde, A. (2023). Validación y Comparación de un Nuevo Método para Predecir el Ancho Mesiodistal de Caninos y Premolares no Erupcionados en una Población Chilena de la Región de Valparaíso, Chile. International Journal of Odontostomatology, 17(4), 470–478. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-381x2023000400470

Ghasemi, T., Sabbaghzadeh, M., Mollaei, M., & Mirzaei, M. (2024). Comparison of the different methods of width estimation in unerupted canine and premolars. BMC Oral Health, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04053-8

Gowd, S., Shankar, T., Dash, S., Sahoo, N., Chatterjee, S., & Mohanty, P. (2017). A comparative evaluation of mixed dentition analysis on reliability of cone beam computed tomography image compared to plaster model. Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry, 0(0), 0. https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_182_17

Kakkar, A.; Gupta, K.; Sharma, R. et al. (2019). Applicability of Tanaka–Johnston, Moyers, and Bernabé and Flores–Mir mixed dentition analyses in school-going children of Sri Ganganagar City, Rajasthan (India): A cross-sectional study. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry, 10(3), 410. https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_654_18

Medina García, B., & Palma Díaz, E. (2013). Reabsorción radicular del segundo molar temporal causada por erupción del primer molar permanente, en pacientes de 4 a 7 años, Universidad de Talca (Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Talca (Chile). Escuela de Odontología).

Published

2026-01-29

Issue

Section

Research Article

Categories

How to Cite

Concordance in the estimation of space requirements in orthodontics: Tanaka Index vs Cone Beam. (2026). Odontología Vital, 1(44). https://doi.org/10.59334/ROV.v1i44.676

Similar Articles

1-10 of 204

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.