Analysis and Evaluation of Nasal Angles in Non-Surgical Rhinoplasty with Hyaluronic Acid

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59334/ROV.v2i43.666

Palabras clave:

ácido hialurónico, remodelación nasal, rinoplastía no quirúrgica, ángulo nasolabial, análisis del perfil facial

Resumen

Background: Studies show the efficacy and safety of nasal reshaping with hyaluronic acid. However, there is little evidence on the clinical parameters modified to achieve an aesthetic improvement in the nasal profile. In aesthetic analysis, the nasolabial angle has often been used to evaluate the rotation of the nasal tip in non-surgical rhinoplasty, a parameter dependent on the position of the upper lip. The researchers declare no conflicts of interest.   Objective: The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the changes induced by non-surgical rhinomodelling in the nasal profile by measuring the nasolabial angle traced on soft tissues and the new nasal angle proposed by the authors. Additionally, the study highlights the efficacy and safety of nasal reshaping with hyaluronic acid. Methods: This is a prospective open-label study where the outcome of rhinoplasty treatment with cannula (23G x 38 mm) was evaluated in 25 adult patients (treated in the areas of the nasal spine, columella, and supratip) using a maximum of 0,6 ml of hyaluronic acid. Results: Twenty-five patients participated in this study (22 women and 3 men) with an average age of 34 years. An average of 0.33 ± 0.11 ml of hyaluronic acid was infiltrated during the procedure. Twenty-two patients underwent this procedure for the first time during this study, while the other three had undergone between 1 to 3 previous procedures. Only two patients required a second intervention, using an average of 0.18 ml. Nasolabial angles before and after treatment were measured; on average, this increased from 89.3 ± 11.3° to 98.4 ± 8.2° (average change of 9.1 ± 7.3°). No complications were recorde. Conclusion: Statistically significant changes were observed when comparing the nasolabial angle measurements before and after the procedure, with an average increase of 9º, as determined through nasal profile analysis and subsequently tested in STATA 11 (P=0.0000). Additionally, given that the nasolabial angle may vary due to aging and modifications in perioral structures, it is necessary to measure another angle to assess nasal tip projection.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

  • Javier Rojo Pereira, Virtus Academy

    Especialista en Cirugía Maxilofacial

Referencias

Akinbiyi, T., Othman, S., Familusi, O., Calvert, C., Card, E. B., & Percec, I. (2020). Better Results in Facial Rejuvenation with Fillers. In Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open (Vol. 8, Issue 10, p. E2763). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002763

Alshawaf, S. M., McGuire, C., ElAbd, R., Fakih-Gomez, N., Williams, J., AlYouha, S., & Samargandi, O. A. (2024). Preferred Nasolabial Angle in Rhinoplasty: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 44(3), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjad309

American Society of Plastic Surgeon. (2021). The centerpiece of the face: Why nonsurgical rhinoplasties are gaining popularity | ASPS. https://www.plasticsurgery.org/news/articles/the-centerpiece-of-the-face-why-nonsurgical-rhinoplasties-are-gaining-popularity

American Society of Plastic Surgeon. (2022). 2022 ASPS Procedural Statistics Release. In Plastic and reconstructive surgery (Vol. 1, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011235

Bertossi, D., Giampaoli, G., Verner, I., Pirayesh, A., Nocini, R., & Nocini, P. (2019). Complications and management after a nonsurgical rhinoplasty: A literature review. Dermatologic Therapy, 32(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.12978

Bertossi, D., Magagnotto, N., Chirumbolo, S., D’Souza, A., & Nocini, R. (2022). Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty: Long-Term Follow-Up of High G′ HA Nasal Injections. Facial Plastic Surgery, 38(2), 96–101. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742431

DeVictor, S., Ong, A. A., & Sherris, D. A. (2021). Complications Secondary to Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. In Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States) (Vol. 165, Issue 5, pp. 611–616). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820987827

Frédéric, B., Philippe, K., Jérôme, P., & Florian, N. (2023). Concepts and principles of medical rhinoplasty. Journal of Dermatology & Cosmetology, 7(4), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.15406/jdc.2023.07.00254

Helal, H. A., Ghanem, M. A. M., Al-Badawy, A. M., Abdel Haleem, M. M., & Mousa, M. H. (2019). Histological and Anthropometric Changes in the Aging Nose. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 39(9), 943–952. https://doi.org/10.1093/ASJ/SJY245

Kumar, V., Jain, A., Atre, S., Shome, D., Kapoor, R., Doshi, K., & Vadera, S. (2021). Non-surgical rhinoplasty using hyaluronic acid dermal fillers: A systematic review. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 20(8), 2414–2424. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.14173

Youn, S. H., & Seo, K. K. (2016). Filler Rhinoplasty Evaluated by Anthropometric Analysis. Dermatologic Surgery, 42(9), 1071–1081. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000832

Publicado

2025-07-11

Número

Sección

Artículo de investigación

Categorías

Cómo citar

Analysis and Evaluation of Nasal Angles in Non-Surgical Rhinoplasty with Hyaluronic Acid. (2025). Odontología Vital, 2(43). https://doi.org/10.59334/ROV.v2i43.666

Artículos similares

1-10 de 203

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.