Evaluation of mesiodens using Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Authors

  • Rodrigo Villanueva Conejeros Andres Bello University
  • Tania Pérez Oñate Andres Bello University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59334/ROV.v1i20.299

Keywords:

Intraosseous, mesiodens, cone beam computed tomography

Abstract

Background: Supernumerary teeth are defined as those in excess when compared to the normal series. Most of them remain unerupted. Mesiodens, usually located in the midline of upper jaw, are the most common, they can cause a variety of complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of intraosseous mesiodens and its relationship to neighboring anatomical structures, using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

Material and Method: This is a non experimental, descriptive, cross sectional and retrospective study in Santiago, Metropolitan Region, Chile. Cone Beam images from 41 patients (44 cases) between 8 and 38 years old, who mainly consult for orthodontic treatment. To carry out this research, the DICOM files from the database of a Maxillofacial Imaging Center, were evaluated twice and the intra observer agreement was determined using Cohen’s Kappa test.

Results: The most common morphology corresponded to conical mesiodens. A large percentage of mesiodens were in inverted orientation, followed by those located horizontally. Contact with other teeth was found in over half of the cases, while 8% of adjacent numeraries showed root resorption. In half of the cases, contact with nasal cavity was found. It was found a significant percentage of contact of crowns and roots of mesiodens with nasopalatine duct. In a fifth of all cases, misalignment of adjacent teeth was established.

Conclusions: It can be concluded that Cone Beam Computed Tomography provides important information about supernumerary teeth position, pericoronary space, relationship to neighboring anatomical structures and possible alterations that they can cause.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Calvano Küchler E., Gomes Da Costa A., De Castro Costa M., Rezende Vieira A., Granjeiro J. M. (2010). Supernume-rary teeth vary depending on gender. Pediatric Dentistry ; 25(1):76-79. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242011000100013

Canut Brusola J. A. (2010). Ortodoncia Clínica y Terapéutica. 2nd ed. Barcelona: Masson; 2010: 397-399.

Cerda J, Villarroel L. (2010). Evaluación de la concordancia inter-observador en investigación pediátrica: Coefi-ciente de Kappa. Revista chilena de pediatría; 79(1):54-58. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0370-41062008000100008

De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen G. R. J. (2009). Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region. A systematic review of the literature. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg; 38: 609-625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2009.02.028

Dev Kapil K., Suvil W., Fazil A., Singh Yajuvender H. (2012). Supernumerary Teeth. Indian Journal of Dental Scien-ces; 4(1):149-150.

Fleming PS, Xavier GM, Dibiase AT, Cobourne M. T. (2010). Revisiting the supernumerary: the epidemiological and molecular basis of extra teeth. British Dental Journal; 208(1):25-30. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.1177

Fuentes J, Villanueva R. (2011). Evaluación de caninos maxilares permanentes intraóseos en posición ectópica, por medio de tomografía computada de haz cónico. Tesis para optar al grado de Magíster en Odontología con especialización en Radiología Dental y Maxilofacial. Dic: 1-55.

Günduz K, Çelenk P, Zengin Z, Sümer P. (2008). Mesiodens: a radiographic study in children. J of Oral Science; 50(3):287-291. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.50.287

Hyun HK et al. (2009). Clinical characteristics and complications associated with mesiodentes. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 67(12):2639-2643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.041

Katheria B, Kau C, Tate R, Chen J, English J, Bouquot J. (2010). Effectiveness of Impacted and Supernumerary Tooth Diagnosis from Traditional Radiography Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Pediatric Dentistry Jul-Ago; 32:304-309.

Parolia A, Kundabala M, Dahal M, Mohan M, Tomas M. (2011). Management of supernumerary teeth. Journal of Conservative Dentistry Jul- Sept ; 14(3):221-224. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.85791

Proff P, Fanghänel J, Allegrini Jr. S, Bayerlein T, Gedrange T. (2006). Problems of supernumerary teeth, hyperdontia or dentes supernumerarii. Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger Mar; 188(2):163-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2005.10.005

Scarfe WC, Farman AG. (2008). What is Cone-Beam CT and how does it work? Dental Clinics of North America; 52(4):707-730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2008.05.005

Shah A, Gill D, Tredwin C, Naini F. (2008). Diagnosis and Management of Supernumerary Teeth. Dental Update; 35(8):510-520. https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2008.35.8.510

Van Buggenhout G, (2008). Mesiodens. European Journal of Medical Genetocs; 51(2):178-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2007.12.006

White SC, (2001). Radiología oral. Principios e interpretación. 4th ed.: Elsevier; 359.

Yoon RK, Chussid S, Davis MJ. (2008). Impacted maxillary anterior supernumerary teeth. N Y State Dent J; 74(6):24-27.

Yoon RK, Chussid S, Davis MJ. (2011). Mesiodens: A clinical and radiographic study in children. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontics and Preventive Dentistry; 29(11):34-38. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.79928

Published

2014-01-01

How to Cite

Villanueva Conejeros, R., & Pérez Oñate, T. (2014). Evaluation of mesiodens using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. O.V., 1(20), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.59334/ROV.v1i20.299

Issue

Section

Research Article

Métricas alternativas