Comparison of Titanium Plates vs. Resorbable Plates in Orbital Fractures: Literature Review

Authors

  • María Raquel Costales Reyes Estudiante odontología
  • María Viviana Mora Astorga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59334/ROV.v2i39.541

Keywords:

Bone fractures, orbit, biocompatible materials, emergency treatment, bone plates, titanium

Abstract

Introduction: Treatments for orbit fractures are based on the correction of the defect of blow in and blow out orbital injuries, by means of various plates and meshes biocompatible with the organism, giving a first generation healing avoiding a bony callus and a more rigid fixation. For the diagnosis of this type of lesions we have periorbital inflammation, enophthalmos, diplopia, ecchymosis, subconjunctival hemorrhage. There are several reconstructive materials being these composed of different raw materials, such as alloplastic and autogenous, where we find several types such as titanium plates and resorbable plates being these the most common and currently used, for its low stimulus to bone resorption and avoiding long-term side effects. These plates have different degrees of ductility and resistance. Several complications have been reported depending on the type of plates, such as scarring, post surgical surgeries in the case of titanium plates, etc. The objective of this review is to evaluate the efficacy of resorbable versus titanium plates in orbital fractures. Materials and methods: this research are a documentary, descriptive and non-experimental nature. A prism-type methodology of identification and inclusion of scientific articles was used. Results and conclusions: The advantages and disadvantages of both resorbable and titanium plates were verified, being these similar in biocompatibility with the human organism, as well as several differences such as support, forces, resistance of the same, concluding that it is debatable. the ideal material to treat orbital fractures. Articles were selected considering the title and objectives; considering comparative studies, systematic reviews, literature reviews, which included criteria regarding orbitalfractures and surgical treatments. The search yielded 55 articles in PubMed, 65 in Google, 4 in Scielo and 29 in Science direct, from which books, monographs, experimental studies were excluded, resulting in 21 articles for the development of this bibliographic review. The 21 articles were read and analyzed in their entirety, studying the objectives, methodology and conclusion of each one of them for subsequent comparison.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agnihotry, A., Fedorowicz, Z., Nasser, M., & Gill, K. S. (2017). Resorbable versus titanium plates for orthognathic surgery (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017(10), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006204.PUB3 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006204.pub3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006204.pub3

Bord, P. S., & Linden, J. (2008). Trauma to the Globe and Orbit. EMERGENCY MEDICINE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 26, 97-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emc.2007.11.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emc.2007.11.006

Castillo Cardiel, M. G., Flores Valdivia, J. L., González Ojeda, A., Cervantes Guevara, G., Cervantes Cardona, G. A., Ramírez-Sánchez,

M. V., Fuentes Orozco, C., Jiménez López Portillo, F. N., Castillo Cardiel, M. G., Flores Valdivia, J. L., González Ojeda, A., Cervantes Guevara, G., Cervantes Cardona, G. A., Ramírez-Sánchez, M. V., Fuentes Orozco, C., & Jiménez López Portillo, F. N. (2021). Fracturas faciales, manejo quirúrgico y resultados en un hospital de tercer nivel. Revista Española de Cirugía Oral y Maxilofacial, 43(3), 96-100. https://doi.org/10.20986/recom.2021.1216/2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20986/recom.2021.1216/2020

Castro Espitia, L. E., Naranjo Restrepo, R. F., & Duque Serna, F. L. (2016). Comparación Mecánica de Dos Sistemas de Fijación Interna Rígida Utilizados en la Fijación de Fracturas Faciales (Estudio In Vitro). Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq, 27(2), 262-280. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.v27n2a2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.v27n2a2

Darío Sánchez López, J., Villegas Calvo, M., & Cambil Martín, J. (2015). Sistemas biodegradables de fijación y reconstrucción craneofacial . SANITARIOS Panorama Actual Del Medicamento, 39(381), 237-240.

De La Cuesta Martín, E. R., Cámara Vallejo, M., Vela Marín, A. C., Bernal Lafuente, C., Seral Moral, P., & Romeo Tris, A. (2016). Manejo integral de las fracturas orbitarias. Hallazgos radiológicos, técnicas y materiales quirúrgicos y evaluación de complicaciones. ELSEVIER España, 58, 1-58.

Fernando, G., Ramírez, M., & Unda, P. (2014, December). Manejo de las Fracturas Panfaciales. Revisión Bibliográfica. Repositorio Digital USFQ, 1-337. https://repositorio.usfq.edu.ec/bitstream/23000/7443/1/112598.pdf

Hwang, K., Joon Kim, H., & Lee, H. S. (2013). Blow-In Fracture of the Orbit. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 25(5), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182903567 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182903567

Koktekir, B. E., Bakbak, B., Karamese, M., Gedik, S., & Tosun, Z. (2012). Scleral Perforation Complicating Titanium Mesh Plaque in Orbital Blowout Fracture. The Journal of Craniofacial Surger, 23(4), 964-965. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31824e5c5d DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31824e5c5d

L. Khojastepour, M. Moannaei, H.R. Eftekharian, M.S. Khaghaninejad, M. Mahjoori-Ghasrodashti, & S. Tavanafar. (2020). Prevalence and severity of orbital blowout fractures. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.07.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.07.001

Licéaga Reyes, R., Barrientos Velázquez, M., & Banda Oyervides, R. E. (2013). Material reabsorbible en el manejo de fracturas de órbita en paciente pediátrico. Rev Hosp Jua Mex, 80(2), 125-128. www.maxilofacial.com.mx

Moe Kris S., Murr Andrew H., & Tullis Wester, S. (2018). Orbital Fractures. Facial Plast Surg Clin , 26, 237-251.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2017.12.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2017.12.007

Morales Navarro, D. (2017). Fracturas orbitarias Orbital fractures. Revista Cubana de Estomatología / Scielo, 54(4). http://scielo.sld.cu

Morales Navarro, D. (2018). Fracturas del tercio medio facial Midface fractures. Revista Cubana de Estomatología, 55(1), 42-58. http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/est/v55n1/a06_1388.pdf

Olate, S., Pablo, J., Herdener, A., Duque, H., Chaves Netto, M., Jaimes, M., Mazzonetto, R., Olate, S. ;, Alister, H. J. P. ;, & Chaves Netto, D. D. M. H. ; (2008). Reconstrucción de Piso de Orbita con Malla de Titanio en Trauma de Tercio Medio Facial Orbital Floor Reconstruction with Titanium Mesh for Middle Third Fracture. Int. J. Odontostomat, 2(2), 163-170.

Patricio Marcelo Unda Jaramillo., Anita del Carmen Ramos Robalino., Luis Miguel León Pachano., Alex Esteban Carrera Robalino., Luigy Wladimir Lorenty Ruiz., & Andy Guillermo Criollo Arroyo. (2021). Estudio de casos de fracturas orbito cigomática en el hospital de especialidades de las Fuerzas Armadas número1-Quito en dos escenarios distintos. ODONTOINVESTIGACION, 7(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.18272/oi.v7i2.1937

Pimentel-Mendoza AB, Rico-Pérez L, & Villarreal-Gómez LJ. (2018). Materiales Reabsorbibles en el Tratamiento de Fracturas Maxilofaciales Pediátricas. RECIT, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.37636/recit.v1117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37636/recit.v1117

Rajah Gunarajah, D., & Samman, N. (2013). Biomaterials for Repair of Orbital Floor Blowout Fractures: A Systematic Review. American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 71(6), 550-570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2012.10.029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2012.10.029

Ramponi, R. D., Astorino, T., & Colleen R. Bessetti-Barret. (2017). Orbital Floor Fractures. Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal, 39(4), 240-247. https://doi.org/10.1097/TME.0000000000000163 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/TME.0000000000000163

Reyes, J. M., Fernanda, M., Vargas, G., Rosenvasser, J., Arocena, M. A., Medina, A. J., & Funes, J. (2013). Clasificación y caracterización epidemiológica de las fracturas orbitarias diagnosticadas mediante tomografía computada. Revista Argentina de Radiología / Scielo , 77(2), 139-146. https://doi.org/10.7811/rarv77n2a07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7811/rarv77n2a07

Rountree, K. M., & Blase, J. J. (2017). Isolated orbital roof blow-in fracture. ELSEVIER, 12, 16-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcr.2017.10.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcr.2017.10.008

Sivam, A., & Enninghorst, N. (2022). The Dilemma of Reconstructive Material Choice for Orbital Floor Fracture: A Narrative Review. Medicines MDPI, 9(6), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines9010006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines9010006

Unda Jaramillo, P. M., Ramos Robalino, A. del C., León Pachano, L. M., Carrera Robalino, A. E., Lorenty Ruiz, L. W., & Criollo Arroyo, A. G. (2021). Estudio de casos de fracturas orbito cigomática en el hospital de especialidades de las Fuerzas Armadas número1 Quito en dos escenarios distintos. ODONTOINVESTIGACION, 7(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.18272/oi.v7i2.1937 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18272/oi.v7i2.1937

Vasile, V. A., Istrate, S., Iancu, R. C., Piticescu, R. M., Cursaru, L. M., Schmetterer, L., Garhöfer, G., & Cherecheanu, A. P. (2022). Biocompatible Materials for Orbital Wall Reconstruction-An Overview. Materials MDPI, 15(2183), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15062183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15062183

Yu, J., Zhang, J., Chen, S., Han, Q., & Yan, H. (2021). Repair of unilateral combined orbital floor and medial wall fracture using two titanium mesh plates: a modified technique. Annals of Translational Medicine, 9(6), 463. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-59 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-598

Portada del artículo

Published

2023-07-31

How to Cite

Costales Reyes, M. R., & Mora Astorga, M. V. (2023). Comparison of Titanium Plates vs. Resorbable Plates in Orbital Fractures: Literature Review. O.V., 2(39), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.59334/ROV.v2i39.541

Issue

Section

Review

Categories

Métricas alternativas