Clinical outcome of maxillary overdentures according to the number of dental implants in full edentulous patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59334/ROV.v1i40.559Keywords:
Dental Implants, Implant-Supported, maxilla, denture, edentulousAbstract
Objective: To review the literature on the outcome of maxillary overdentures according to the number of dental implants in edentulous patients. Materials and Methods: A systematic bibliographic search was carried out in Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science search engines and, after appliying the criteria and filters, 6 articles were used. Of the 6 articles analyzed, four were randomized clinical trial type studies, one prospective study and one retrospective study. Results: The results of maxillary overdentures, according to the number of implants used to support them, and comparing the most widespread and researched protocols such as All-on-4 and All-on-6, were similar. They are considered optimal, reliable, successful and long-lived, with no significant difference within the number of dental implants placed. Conclusions: Maxillary overdentures supported by 4 or 6 implants were reliable, and exhibit comparable results. The complications were limited, and the results were optimal and enduring.
Downloads
References
Abbasi, M. S., Rahim, S., Qureshi, A. W., Sharif, M., Shah, R., & Minallah, S. (2020). A comparison of cone beam computed tomography and ridge mapping in treatment planning of dental implants. Isra Medical Journal, 12(2), 87-90.
Agliardi, E. L., Pozzi, A., Stappert, C. F. J., Benzi, R., Romeo, D., & Gherlone, E. (2014). Immediate fixed rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla: A prospective clinical and radiological study after 3 years of loading. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 16(2), 292-302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00482.x
An, X., Chui, Z., Yang, H.-W., & Choi, B.-H. (2020). Digital workflow for fabricating an overdenture by using an implant surgical template and intraoral scanner. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 123(5), 675-679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.04.022.
Antoun, H., Belmon, P., Cherfane, P., & Sitbon, J. M. (2012). Immediate loading of four or six implants in completely edentulous patients. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 32(1), e1-9. PMID: 22254222.
Awasthi, N., Rathod, A., Lahiri, B., Kumari, D., Hota, S., & Gupta, S. (2021). Assessment of different methods in measuring alveolar ridge width accuracy before placement of implant: An in vivo study. World Journal of Dentistry, 12(6), 474-478. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1870
Bandiaky, O. N., Lokossou, D. L., Soueidan, A., le Bars, P., Gueye, M., Mbodj, E. B., & le Guéhennec, L. (2022). Implant-supported removable partial dentures compared to conventional dentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of quality of life, patient satisfaction, and biomechanical complications. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research, 8(1), 294-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.521
Beretta, M., Poli, P. P., Tansella, S., Aguzzi, M., Meoli, A., & Maiorana, C. (2021). Cast-free digital workflow for implant-supported rehabilitation in a completely edentulous patient: A clinical report. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 125(2), 197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.12.009. PMID: 32087844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.12.009
Bhering, C. L. B., Mesquita, M. F., Kemmoku, D. T., Noritomi, P. Y., Consani, R. L. X., & Barão, V. A. R. (2016). Comparison between all-on-four and all-on-six treatment concepts and framework material on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: A prototyping guided 3D-FEA study. Materials Science and Engineering C, 69, 715-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.07.059
Brånemark, P. I., Svensson, B., & van Steenberghe, D. (1995). Ten-year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Brånemark in full edentulism. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 6(4), 227-231. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060405.x
Buser, D., Chappuis, V., Belser, U. C., & Chen, S. (2017). Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: when immediate, when early, when late? Periodontol 2000, 73(1), 84-102. doi: 10.1111/prd.12170. PMID: 28000278. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12170
Choudhary, S. B., Asthana, G., Kalsi, R., Saurav, K., Mishra, S. K., Chhina, S., Peku, H., & Ahmad, Z. (2022). Comparative Evaluation of Ridge Width for Implant Placement Using Ridge Mapping on the Diagnostic Cast, Cone-beam Computed Tomography, and Direct Surgical Measurements. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 23(2), 186-192. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3294
Daudt Polido, W., Aghaloo, T., Emmett, T. W., Taylor, T. D., & Morton, D. (2018). Number of implants placed for complete-arch fixed prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 29, 154-183. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13312
Di Francesco, F., de Marco, G., Gironi Carnevale, U. A., Lanza, M., & Lanza, A. (2019). The number of implants required to support a maxillary overdenture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 63(1), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2018.08.006
Kono, K., Kurihara, D., Suzuki, Y., & Ohkubo, C. (2014). Pressure distribution of implant-supported removable partial dentures with stress-breaking attachments. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 58(2), 115-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2014.01.002
Kouveliotis, G., Tasopoulos, T., Karoussis, I., Silva, N. R., & Zoidis, P. (2022). Complete denture digital workflow: Combining basic principles with a CAD-CAM approach. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 127(4), 550-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.024
Hazari, P., Mahajan, H., Mishra, S., & Mishra, P. (2019). A Review of Various Techniques and Studies for Bone Mapping in Oral Implant Placement. Journal of Research and Advancement in Dentistry, 9, 73-83.
Matsudate, Y., Yoda, N., Nanba, M., Ogawa, T., & Sasaki, K. (2016). Load distribution on abutment tooth, implant and residual ridge with distal-extension implant-supported removable partial denture. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 60(4), 282-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.01.008
Morton, D., Gallucci, G., Lin, W. S., Pjetursson, B., Polido, W., Roehling, S., Sailer, I., Aghaloo, T., Albera, H., Bohner, L., Braut, V., Buser, D., Chen, S., Dawson, A., Eckert, S., Gahlert, M., Hamilton, A., Jaffin, R., Jarry, C., …Zhou, W. (2018). Group 2 ITI Consensus Report: Prosthodontics and implant dentistry. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 29, 215-223. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13298
Roccuzzo, M., Bonino, F., Gaudioso, L., Zwahlen, M., & Meijer, H. J. A. (2012). What is the optimal number of implants for removable reconstructions? A systematic review on implant-supported overdentures. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 23(SUPPL.6), 229-237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02544.x
Salman, A., Thacker, S., Rubin, S., Dhingra, A., Ioannidou, E., & Schincaglia, G. P. (2019). Immediate versus delayed loading of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: A 60-month follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 46(8), 863-871. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13153
Schubert, O., Schweiger, J., Stimmelmayr, M., Nold, E., & Güth, J. F. (2019). Digital implant planning and guided implant surgery - workflow and reliability. British Dental Journal, 226(2), 101-108. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2019.44
Shahmiri, R., Aarts, J. M., Bennani, V., Das, R., & Swain, M. v. (2013). Strain distribution in a Kennedy class i implant assisted removable partial denture under various loading conditions. International Journal of Dentistry, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/351279
Slot, W., Raghoebar, G. M., Vissink, A., & Meijer, H. J. A. (2013). Maxillary overdentures supported by four or six implants in the anterior region; 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 40(3), 303-310. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12051
Slot, W., Raghoebar, G. M., Vissink, A., & Meijer, H. J. A. (2014). A comparison between 4 and 6 implants in the maxillary posterior region to support an overdenture; 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 25(5), 560-566. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12118
Slot, W., Raghoebar, G. M., Cune, M. S., Vissink, A., & Meijer, H. J. A. (2016). Maxillary overdentures supported by four or six implants in the anterior region: 5-year results from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 43(12), 1180-1187. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12625
Slot, W., Raghoebar, G. M., Cune, M. S., Vissink, A., & Meijer, H. J. A. (2019). Four or six implants in the maxillary posterior region to support an overdenture: 5-year results from a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 30(2), 169-177. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13403
Sutaria, F., Shah, D., Chauhan, C., Solanki, J., & Bhatti, K. (2019). Comparative evaluation of various methods of assessing residual alveolar ridge width prior to dental implant placement: An in vivo study. Journal of Dental Implants, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.4103/jdi.jdi_19_17
Tallarico, M., Meloni, S. M., Canullo, L., Caneva, M., & Polizzi, G. (2016). Five-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Patients Rehabilitated with Immediately Loaded Maxillary Cross-Arch Fixed Dental Prosthesis Supported by Four or Six Implants Placed Using Guided Surgery. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 18(5), 965-972. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12380
Tun Naing, S., Kanazawa, M., Hada, T., Iwaki, M., Komagamine, Y., Miyayasu, A., Uehara, Y., & Minakuchi, S. (2022). In vitro study of the effect of implant position and attachment type on stress distribution of implant-assisted removable partial dentures. Journal of Dental Sciences, 17(4), 1697-1703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.11.018
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Claudia Guerra Maticorena, Rogger Bardález Daza ; Cesar Pomacóndor Hernández
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Odontología Vital agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and grant Universidad Latina de Costa Rica the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Odontología Vital's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Métricas alternativas
