Methods to measure sagittal and transverse asymmetries in orthodontic study models

Authors

  • Emma Kathia Victoria Landa Ochoa Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
  • Luis Fernando Pérez Vargas Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
  • Sandra P. Palomino-Gómez Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59334/ROV.v1i37.476

Abstract

Introduction for the correct diagnosis in the treatment of orthodontic patients requires a series of auxiliary examinations, which are essential tools in orthodontics, however we found a certain degree of difficulty in assessing dental asymmetries in the hemiarchs of each dental arch; The importance of the correct assessment of asymmetries is already widely mentioned in different studies, because it will help us with the correct location of the teeth in their arch, at the end of the treatment. Currently there is little literature on the methods to evaluate and diagnose hemiarchal alterations, especially in the transverse plane. The objective is to review the literature on the methods of measuring intra-arch dental asymmetries in order to identify and quantify dental alterations in the three planes of space in their respective dental arch, the Method for the search terms of the information were: dental and facial asymmetry, molar asymmetry in orthodontics, arch width prediction indices, as well as cross-sectional discrepancies. Pubmed, Medline, Scielo, Schoolar Google, of which 80 articles related to our study topic were collected and only 30 articles and 6 orthodontic books were chosen on which this article is based, Results Also in this article we present the tools that we have for the diagnosis of intra-arch dental asymmetry such as the Sthmuch plate and the Korkhaus millimeter plate, and finally we propose a method that allows us to objectively quantify the asymmetry in the three space plan in a simple, reproducible way and easy to store on a computer. Conclusion The stage of diagnosis is important because it will allow obtaining the greatest and best information on the dental alterations that the patient presents, being the transversal alterations the most difficult to quantify because most studies and indices, since they only show the distances of Contralateral teeth, which are limited data but still contribute to the diagnosis, the Sthmuch, Korkhaus and Bernklau plate method are proposed to measure intra-arch dental asymmetries, not as it is wearisome for the operator and his patients. objective results lies in the experience of the operator; The KLO method allows us to objectively quantify the lack of dental symmetry in each arch in an easy, reproducible way that can be stored on a computer or in a file.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad Hasan, Afeef Umar Zia, A. S. (2016). Prevalence of asymmetrie molar relationship in orthodontic patients. Pakista Journal Orthodontic, 2(8), 94–97.

Ahmad Hasan, M. R. (2017). Effect of asymmetric molar and canine relationship on dental midlines in orthodontic patients. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal, 37(1), 87–91.

Almeida, M. R. de. (2012). Ortodoncia Clínica y Biomecánica (1era Edición).

Arvind Tr, P., & Dinesh, S. S. (2020). Can palatal depth influence the buccolingual inclination of molars? A cone beam computed tomography-based retrospective evaluation. Journal of Orthodontics, 47(4), 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465312520941523

Bhateja NK, Fida M, S. A. (2014). Frecuency of dentofacial asymmetries: a cross-sectional on orthodontic patients. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad., 26(2), 129–133.

Burstone, Charles J. Marcotte, M. R. (2000). Problem Solving in Orthodontics: Goal-Oriented Treatment Strategies (Q. P. Co (ed.); 1era Editi).

Burstone, C. J. (1998). Diagnosis and treatment planning of patients with asymmetries. Seminars in Orthodontics, 4(3), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1073-8746(98)80017-0

Cheong, You-Wei. Lo, L.-J. (2011). Facial Asymmetry: Etiology Evaluation and Management. Chang Gung Med J., 34(4), 341–351.

Chung, C. H. (2019). Diagnosis of transverse problems. Seminars in Orthodontics, 25(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2019.02.003

Cohen, M. M. (1995). Perspectives on craniofacial asymmetry. IV. Hemi-asymmetries. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 24(2), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(06)80086-X

Dhirendra Srivastara, Harpreet Singh, S. M. and C. (2017). Facial asymmetry revisited: Part I-Diagnosis and treatment planning.

Journal Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research, 8.

Dong-soon, C., Young-mok, J., Insan, J., Jost-brinkmann, P. G., & Bong-Kuen, C. (2010). Accuracy and reliability of palatal superimposition of three-dimensional digital models. Angle Orthodontist, 80(4), 685–691. https://doi.org/10.2319/101309-569.1

Ferreira, F. V. (2002). Ortodoncia Diagnóstico y planificación Clinica (A. medicas LTDA (ed.); 1era ed.).

Graber, Thomas M. Vanarsdall, R. L. (1997). Ortodoncia: Principios generales y técnicas (Editorial Medica Panamericana (Segunda Ed).

Habib, F., De, L., Fleischmann, A., Kívia, S., Gama, C., & Martins De Araújo, T. (2007). Obtenção de modelos ortodônticos. 12(3), 146–156.

Hwang, H. S., Yuan, D., Jeong, K. H., Uhm, G. S., Cho, J. H., & Yoon, S. J. (2012). Three-dimensional soft tissue analysis for the evaluation of facial asymmetry in normal occlusion individuals. Korean Journal of Orthodontics, 42(2), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2012.42.2.56

Ko, EWC. Lin,S.C. Chen,Y.R. Huang, C. S. (2012). Skeletal and Dental Variables Related to the Stability of Oorthognathic Surgery in Skeletal Class III Malocclusion with a Surgery-first Approach. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 71(5), 215–223.

Koo, Y. J., Choi, S. H., Keum, B. T., Yu, H. S., Hwang, C. J., Melsen, B., & Lee, K. J. (2017). Maxillomandibular arch width differences at estimated centers of resistance: Comparison between normal occlusion and skeletal Class III malocclusion. Korean Journal of Orthodontics, 47(3), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2017.47.3.167

Lalangui Matamoros Joe, Juca Guamán Claudia, Molina Alvarado Alejandra, Lasso Cabrera Gustavo, Yunga Picón Yolanda, B. S. V. (2020). Métodos diagnósticos para estudio de anomalías dentomaxilares en sentido transversal. Revisión bibliográfica. REVISTA LATINOAMERICANA DE ORTODONCIA Y ORTOPEDIAPEDIATRICA.

Liu F, van der Lijn F, Schurmann C, Zhu G, Chakravarty MM, et ál. (2012). A genome-wide association study identifies five loci influencing facial morphology in Europeans. PLoS Genet, 8.

Lujan Bravo, Y., & Patricia Eugenia Burbano, Antonio Bedoya Rodríguez, Julio Cesar Osorio, Julián Tamayo Cardona, C. H. M. (2014). Variabilidad en medidas de los arcos dentales y su relación con la diferenciación poblacional-Revisión sistemática. Colombian Journal of Dental Research, 5(15).

Luu, N. S., Nikolchevab, L. G., Retrouveyc, J.-M., Flores-Mird, C., & El-Bialye, Tarek. Careyf, Jason P.Major, P. W. (2012). Linear measurements using virtual study models A systematic review. Angle Orthodontist, Vol 82, No 6, 2012, 82(6), 2012.

Melsen, B. (2013). Ortodoncia del adulto (Amolca (ed.); primera Edición.

Rastegar-Lari, T., Al-Azemi, R., Thalib, L., & Årtun, J. (2012). Dental arch dimensions of adolescent Kuwaitis with untreated ideal occlusion: Variation and validity of proposed expansion indexes. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 142(5), 635–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.05.018

Sawchuk, D., Currie, K., Vich, M. L., Palomo, J. M., & Flores-Mir, C. (2016). Diagnostic methods for assessing maxillary skeletal and dental transverse deficiencies: A systematic review. Korean Journal of Orthodontics, 46(5), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2016.46.5.331

Scanavini, P. E., Paranhos, L. R., Torres, F. C., Vasconcelos, M. H. F., Jóias, R. P., & Scanavini, M. A. (2012). Evaluation of the dental arch asymmetry in natural normal occlusion and Class II malocclusion individuals. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 17(1), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2176-94512012000100016

Servert, TR.Proffit, W. (1997). The prevalence of facial asymmetry in the dentofacial defromities population at the University of North Carolina. International Journal of Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery for Adukts, 12(1), 171–176.

Sheats, R. D., McGorray, S. P., Musmar, Q., Wheeler, T. T., & King, G. J. (1998). Prevalence of orthodontic asymmetries. Seminars in Orthodontics, 4(3), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1073-8746(98)80015-7

Simplício, Alexandre Henrique de Melo; Souza, Léo Anísio de; Sakima, Maurício Tatsuei; Martins, Joel Cláudio da Rosa; Sakima, T. (1995). Confiabilidade de xerox de modelos de estudo para o traçado de oclusogramas / Reliabiliiy of study models photocopes to tracing oclusogram. Ortodontia, 28(3), 68–7.

Sora, B. C., & Jaramillo, P. M. (2005). Diagnóstico de las asimetrías faciales y dentales. Rev Fac Odont Univ Ant, 16((1 y 2)), 15–25.

Staudt, C. B. S. K. (2010). Association between mandibular asymmetry and occlusal asymmetry in young adult males with class III malocclusion. Acta Odontologica Escandinavia, 6, 131–140.

Tamburrino R, Boucher NS, Vanarsdall RL, S. A. (2010). The transverse dimension: diagnosis and relevance to functional occlusion. Roth Williams Legacy Fund Donors, 2(1), 13–22.

Thiesen, G., Gribel, B. F., & Freitas, M. P. M. (2015). Facial asymmetry : a current review. Dental Press J Orthod., 20(6), 110–125.

Thomas Rakosi. Irmtrud, J. (1992). Atlas de ortopedia maxilar: diagnóstico (Masson.S.A. (ed.); ediciones).

Willian R. Proffit, H. W. F. and D. M. S. (2008). Ortodoncia Contemporánea (Elsevier (ed.); 5ta ed.).

Windhager S, Schachl H, Schaefer K, Mitteroecker P, Huber S, Wallner B, F. M. (2014). Variation at Genes Influencing Facial Morphology Are Not Associated with Developmental Imprecision in Human Faces. Plos One, 9(6).

Portada de artículo

Published

2022-09-13

How to Cite

Landa Ochoa, E. K. V., Pérez Vargas, L. F. ., & Palomino-Gómez, S. P. (2022). Methods to measure sagittal and transverse asymmetries in orthodontic study models. O.V., 2(37), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.59334/ROV.v1i37.476

Issue

Section

Review

Categories

Métricas alternativas