Fracture resistance of crowns prepared with lithium disilicate applied to different marginal terminations F

Authors

  • Marco Zúñiga Llerena Universidad de las Américas
  • Fabián Rosero Salas Universidad de las Américas
  • Byron Velásquez Ron Universidad de las Américas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59334/ROV.v1i32.379

Keywords:

Dental crown, dental materials, dental restoration failure, dental preparation, lithium disilicate, chamfer, knife edge, flexural resistance, CAD–CAM, computed aided design

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the influence of the type of shoulder margins; Knife edge (F) and Chamfer (C) on the
flexural strength of CAD / CAM lithium disilicate crowns in thicknesses of 0.8 mm and 0.5 mm. Materials
and Methods: 40 healthy upper premolars, in 2 groups according to the type of termination G1 = F and G2 =
C; 2 subgroups referring to the material thickness Sg1 = 0.8mm and Sg2 0.5mm (5 crowns for each subgroup),
were subjected to vertical (v) and horizontal (h) compression forces. The most frequent type of fracture was
observed; cohesive in porcelain (cp), adhesive in porcelain (ap), mixed small (mp) and mixed long (ml). Results:
in preparations with 0.8 mm and 0.5 mm thicknesses, there was a significant difference in relation to the best
termination, this was C; their values were Sg1 (h = 1347.2 N / v = 1402.0.F; Sg1 (h = 965.6 N / v = 794.8 N) .F at 0.5
mm showed better performance against horizontal forces C; Sg2 (h = 924.8 N / v = 813.4 N) and for F; Sg2 (h =
1217.0 N / v = 576.0 N) Conclusions: the most frequent type of fracture is cp and ap finishing chamfer and knife
edge can be used safely show acceptable values of flexural strength, by reducing the thickness of the chamfer
restoration reduces its strength, the knife edge increases it.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2020-10-06

How to Cite

Zúñiga Llerena, M. ., Rosero Salas, F. . ., & Velásquez Ron, B. . (2020). Fracture resistance of crowns prepared with lithium disilicate applied to different marginal terminations F. O.V., 1(32). https://doi.org/10.59334/ROV.v1i32.379

Issue

Section

Research Article

Métricas alternativas