ODONTOLOGÍA VITAL P. 69
Revista Odontología Vital
No. 38, Vol 1, 69-76 2023 I ISSN:2215-5740
Management and Follow-up of Orthodontic Forced
Extrusion: A Case Report.
Manejo y seguimiento de la extrusión forzada de
ortodoncia: Un informe de caso.
English version
Abstract
The case of an adult patient with a complicated crown
fracture of the right upper canine due to trauma is
reported, diagnosing a class VII Ellis coronal fracture.
There are several treatment alternatives that range
from the extraction, placement of a bone graft and
placement of an implant, to a forced root extrusion
with bone removal to allow the biological space and
subsequently be restored.
In the present case, a multidisciplinary orthodontic
forced extrusion treatment is performed, which
allows to increase the amount of clinical remnant,
preserving the periodontal support and maintaining
the biologic thickness, thus achieving to maintain
the root remnant with good length so that prosthetic
rehabilitation is facilitated.
The clinical and radiographic follow-up was 12 months.
The multidisciplinary treatment
involved: Root canal treatment, forced extrusion with
orthodontics, fibrotomy with root planing and fixed
prosthesis.
Key words:
Trauma, Coronary fracture, Endodontics, Forced
extrusion, Prosthetic Restoration.
Introduction
Some of the main reasons why patients go to the
dentist are: Aesthetic and chewing problems, so
patients prioritize this type of treatment (Uribe et al.,
2010). Dental trauma represents a real therapeutic
Ojeda-Gutiérrez, F, Martínez-Zumarán, A, Manzur-Sandoval, N, González-Correa, R, Ojeda- Juárez, JF, Garrocho-
Rangel, JA, Zavala Alonso, NV., Ojeda-Gutiérrez, F. Manejo de extrusión forzada ortodóntica: Reporte de un caso.
Odontología Vital No. 38, Vol 1, 58-67. 2023, ISSN:2215-5740 Versión traducida al inglés. Originalenespañol.
Revista Odontología Vital
https://revistas.ulatina.ac.cr/index.php/
odontologiavital
ISSN: 2215-5740
Ojeda-Gutiérrez F, Martínez-Zumarán
A, Manzur-Sandoval N, González-Correa
R, Ojeda- Juárez JF, Garrocho-Rangel
JA, Zavala Alonso NV.
Ojeda-Gutiérrez F. Facultad de
Estomatología. Universidad Autónoma
de San Luis Potosí. E-mail: fojeda@
uaslp.mx. Orcid: 0000-0002-4034-4583
Martínez-Zumarán A. Facultad de
Estomatología. Universidad Autónoma
de San Luis Potosí. E-mail:alanzuma@
uaslp.mx. Orcid: 0000-0001-5494-1816
Manzur-Sandoval N. Facultad
de Estomatología. Universidad
Autónoma de San Luis Potosí. E-mail:
manzur_nahim@hotmail.com. Orcid:
0000-0003-4770-8156
González-Correa R. Facultad de
Estomatología. Universidad Autónoma
de San Luis Potosí. E-mail: rogelio.
gonzalez@uaslp.mx. Orcid: 0000-0002-
8163-4093
Ojeda- Juárez JF. Facultad de
Estomatología. Universidad Autónoma
de San Luis Potosí. E-mail: francisco.
ojeda@uaslp.mx. Orcid: 0000-0003-
0912-0466
Garrocho-Rangel JA. Facultad
de Estomatología. Universidad
Autónoma de San Luis Potosí.
E-mail: arturo.garrocho@uaslp.mx.
Orcid:0000-0001-9123-0300
Zavala-Alonso NV. Facultad de
Estomatología. Universidad Autónoma
de San Luis Potosí. E-mail:nveroza@
fest.uaslp.mx. Orcid: 0000-0001-6014-
0994
Facultad de Estomatología.
Universidad Autónoma de San Luis
Potosí.
Autor de correspondencia: Dr.
Francisco Ojeda Gutiérrez. Manuel
Nava # 2. Zona Universitaria. C.P. 78290.
San Luis Potosí, S.L.P., México. E-mail:
fojeda@uaslp.mx
ODONTOLOGÍA VITALP. 70
Revista Odontología Vital
No. 38, Vol 1, 69-76 2023 I ISSN:2215-5740
dilemma for the professional of
stomatology (Koyuturk & Malkoc, 2005).
Most dental injuries occur within the
first two decades of life, although
they can occur at any age, the most
susceptible teeth being the central and
lateral incisors (AAPD, 2008-Forsberg
& Tedestam, 1993). Fractures of the
permanent teeth constitute the most
frequent type of dental trauma, with a
percentage of 26 to 76%.
These injuries involve the loss of
dental tissues hard (Andreasen &
Ravn, 1972-Andreasen, 1993), although
they can involve enamel, or enamel
and dentin, without affecting the
pulp (Arapostathis et al., 2006), good
prognosis (De Blanco, 1996); however,
when it affects the pulp (Cavalleri
& Zerman, 1995-Ojeda et al., 2011),
especially in cases of complex injuries
of root and complicated crown the
prognosis is generally less favourable
long-term (Keinan et al., 2013).
Lesions involving enamel, dentin and
pulp represent from 4 to 16% of all
traumatic dental injuries (Cavalleri &
Zerman, 1995- Stockwell, 1988), with
the central incisors accounting for 80%
and lateral incisors for 16% being the
most frequently affected teeth due to
their protruded and vulnerable anterior
position in the mouth (Andreasen, 1970).
Different criteria have been established
to classify the different types of dental
fractures. The most recognized and
used are those of Black, OMS and Ellis.
(Spinas & Altana, 2002- Ellis & Davey,
1970).
According to these criteria, the
treatment to be followed is established,
which will depend on the degree of
condition caused by the trauma, from
control and observation appointments,
direct or indirect pulp coating, partial
pulpotomy, pulpotomy, pulpectomy, to
tooth extraction.
When the fracture involves the entire
crown, particularly in the anterior sector,
a multidisciplinary dental treatment
involving several pulpal, periodontal
and restorative procedures is indicated.
In the present case, several procedures
were carried out that involved the
treatment of ducts and orthodontic
forced extrusion with fibrotomy, with
the aim of achieving a sufficient dental
structure and an adequate biological
space for prosthetic rehabilitation.
In 1977, Ingber developed the concept
of extrusion force, which is defined
as a vertical movement that is done
with forces orthodontic controlled and
continuous low-intensity, improving
the ratio crown-root and eliminating
defects intraosseous and bags, to allow
the rehabilitation of the crown fractured
(Ingber, 1989). Pontoriero (1987)
proposes to perform the fibrotomy
(resection of the periodontal fibers)
together with the forced extrusion,
which allowed to reduce the eruption
time, resulting in an elongation of
the crown without the need for bone
resection (Pontoriero et al., 1987).
The objective of this report is to describe
the management and follow-up of a
case of orthodontic forced extrusion
and the multidisciplinary treatment of
the coronal fracture of an upper canine
in an elderly adult patient.
ODONTOLOGÍA VITAL P. 71
Revista Odontología Vital
No. 38, Vol 1, 69-76 2023 I ISSN:2215-5740
Case Report
Apparently healthy 78-year-old patient
comes to the clinic of the Specialty of
Orthodontics and Dentomaxillofacial
Orthopedics, referred by a specialist in
Endodontics, due to corono-radicular
fracture of right upper canine, fixed
bridge abutment of three units (Figure
1). The patient reports having received
a blow to the mouth about three weeks
ago.
On physical examination, he presents
good general conditions, with no
apparent wounds or edema in the oral
region.
On intraoral examination, he presents
with a cervical fracture of the crown
of the right upper canine (Ellis class
VII). Periapical radiographs and clinical
percussion, palpation and mobility tests
are performed (Figure 2).
When evaluating the case, it is
determined to carry out dental
treatment with a multidisciplinary
approach, which involves endodontics,
orthodontics (forced extrusion),
periodontics with fibrotomy and
prosthetic rehabilitation.
Figure 1. Corono-root fracture of right upper canine, fixed
bridge abutment.
Figure 2. Diagnostic tests and radiographs for the choice of
multidisciplinary dental treatment.
As a first step, endodontic treatment
was performed on the dental piece and
placement of a supporting intracaval
attachment (emptied endoposteum)
(Figure 3), in order to improve
orthodontic traction.
This attachment consisted of a cast post
with perforations (Figure 4).
After an exhaustive orthodontic
diagnosis, we proceed to place fixed
appliances in the upper arch with MBT
technique (slot 0.022), from the right
molar to the left canine of indirect and
passive cementing (with the slots of the
brackets aligned).
ODONTOLOGÍA VITALP. 72
Revista Odontología Vital
No. 38, Vol 1, 69-76 2023 I ISSN:2215-5740
Immediately after, a 0.019 x 0.025
rectangular arch made of stainless steel
with an extrusion bend was placed at
the level of the right upper canine. In
the same fold, a helix-type loop was
adapted that functioned as a support to
place the passive ligature (the cebanda)
(Figure 5).
Figure 3.1 Performance of endodontic treatment and
placement of endoposte (emptied post).
Figure 4. Drilling and cementation of the endopost.
(post casting)
Figure 5. Helix doublers and placement of orthodontic
appliances.
The activations of the apparatus were
carried out every week with metal
ligation (0.010), expecting an extrusive
movement of 0.5 to 1 mm per week with
a force between 15 and 20 grams per
activation in addition to the realization
of the circumferential supracrestal
fibrotomy to help the extrusion and
avoid its recurrence.
The treatment time to achieve the
planned extrusion was 4 weeks, at the
rate of one millimeter per week, in
addition to 8 weeks of stabilization, for
a total period of three months before
placing the fixed prosthesis.
The circumferential supracrestal
fibrotomy and root planing were
performed before, during and after each
orthodontic activation, in order to be
able to decrease the stabilization time.
During the control appointments, at
three, six, nine and twelve months,
the stability of the extruded tooth was
evaluated, through palpation of the
mucosa, in addition to percussion tests
and X-ray taking, mainly verifying the
absence of clinical and radiographic
signs and symptoms (Figure 6).
ODONTOLOGÍA VITAL P. 73
Revista Odontología Vital
No. 38, Vol 1, 69-76 2023 I ISSN:2215-5740
Figure 6. Prosthetic rehabilitation one year after the start of
orthodontic treatment.
Discussion
The difficulty of treatment in the
dental organs with transverse or
intraalveolar fracture, which involves
enamel, dentin, pulp and cement,
represents a challenge for the dentist,
who must take the necessary measures
to maintain their vitality and their
subsequent restoration in an aesthetic,
pedagogical and functional way.
The accurate diagnosis of each
individual case is carried out through
the evaluation of the mobility of the
coronary segment, the demonstration
x-ray of the fracture line, and, on
special occasions, through computed
tomography, cone beam, which allows
more accurate assessment of the extent
and direction of the fracture line (May et
al., 2013).
Different treatment modalities have
been adopted for this type of injury,
ranging from control and observation
appointments to osteotomy,
gingivectomy, orthodontic extrusion
(Bondemark et al., 1997- Sönmez et
al., 2008- Saito et al., 2009) or surgical,
extraction or intentional reimplantation
(Grossman, 1966).
An alternative treatment is forced
extrusion by orthodontic means (Kumar
et al., 2019), which is a conservative
and predictable method to achieve a
supragingival margin that allows the
survival of the restoration in a longer
term.
In the present case, along with the
forced extrusion, the supracrestal
circumferential fibrotomy was
performed, described by Campbell
(Campbell et al., 1975). This procedure
consists of the resection of the
periradicular fibers to the bottom of
the gingival sulcus and root planing to
minimize possible recurrence (Carvalho
et al., 2006) and improve the stability of
the affected tooth (Bach et al., 2004).
These actions allow the alveolar bone
and the gingival extension to move
together with the root (Edwards,
1988- Brain, 1969). It is recommended
that the orthodontic extrusion speed
be one millimeter of root movement
(Bach et al., 2004- Durham et al., 2004-
Jorgensen & Nowzari, 2001) per month
and subsequently a stabilization period
of eight weeks (Carvalho et al., 2006).
In 2000, Jorgensen (Jorgensen &
Nowzari, 2001) recommended fibrotomy
before, during and after forced
orthodontic eruption, to decrease the
necessary stabilization time.
The advantages of the procedure are
the absence of bone loss or periodontal
support, which usually occurs when
an extraction is performed; the
recurrence of the extruded teeth is
avoided and the aesthetic appearance
left by the extrusion is improved
(Yoshinuma et al., 2009- Gonçalves
et al., 2015). Its disadvantages are
the use of orthodontic devices with
ODONTOLOGÍA VITALP. 74
Revista Odontología Vital
No. 38, Vol 1, 69-76 2023 I ISSN:2215-5740
consequent aesthetic problems and the
impediment to proper oral hygiene.
The treatment time is 2 to 3 months,
plus the stabilization period; according
to Bach (Bach et al., 2004), it is
contraindicated in ankylosed teeth, in
the presence of vertical fracture, teeth
with short roots, insufficient space in
the arch and exposures of the furca.
Keinan (Keinan et al., 2013) and Simon
(Simon et al., 1978) propose in some
cases, where the exposed dental
structure allows it, the placement of a
supporting intra-ductal attachment, but
this technique is not always possible.
In the present case, a hollowed post
was cemented with perforations, which
helped to pull the tooth in a progressive
and controlled way, with an extrusion
speed of one millimeter per week
(Ingber, 1989- Carvalho et al., 2006), for 4
weeks, in addition to a retention period
of eight weeks.
This procedure differed from that
proposed by Durman, who suggests
one month of stabilization for every
millimeter of orthodontic extrusion.
In independent reports, Keinan (Keinan
et al., 2013) and Farmakis (Farmakis,
2018) concluded that the prognosis
of treatment is much more favorable
in young patients. However, in this
case, adequate extrusion was achieved
in an elderly patient, along with the
immediate placement of the prosthesis,
so it represents a comprehensive
and multidisciplinary treatment that
offers good functional and aesthetic
results. During the follow-up period,
every three months until one year
was completed, no pain was reported
in the area, no signs or symptoms of
apical or periapical pathology, nor
radiographic periodontal defects were
presented as expected in an elderly
patient. Finally, the restorations placed
were functionally and aesthetically
acceptable.
Conclusion
Through an interdisciplinary
approach (endodontics, periodontics,
orthodontics and prosthetics)
the dentist can offer quality joint
treatments, such as those described in
the case reported here.
Here all the advantages offered by
forced orthodontic extrusion were taken
advantage of, even in an elderly adult
patient, achieving a traction of four
millimeters. This objective was achieved
thanks to the use of light and controlled
extrusive forces on the affected dental
organ. With the described treatment
modality, a crown lengthening can be
achieved without the need to perform
a bone resection, which allows a correct
prosthetic rehabilitation, returning the
function and aesthetics to the injured
tooth and providing an integral benefit
to the patient.
We consider as a limitation of this
report that the observation time of
the case was not long enough. The
authors declare that there is no conflict
of interest with respect to the case
presented.
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) (BY) Usted debe dar crédito
de manera adecuada, brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo
en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la
licenciante. (NC) Usted no puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales. (SA) Si remezcla, transforma o crea a
partir del material, debe distribuir su contribución bajo la misma licencia del original.
ODONTOLOGÍA VITAL P. 75
Revista Odontología Vital
No. 38, Vol 1, 69-76 2023 I ISSN:2215-5740
References
1.- Uribe et al., (2010). Ortodoncia Teoría y Clínica. Medellín, Colombia. Corporación para investigaciones biológicas.
2.- Koyuturk & Malkoc, (2005). Orthodontic extrusion of subgingivally fractured incisor before restoration. A case report:
3‐years follow‐up. Dental traumatology, 21(3), 174-178.
3.- American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry Clinical Affairs Committee-Pulp Therapy subcommittee [AAPD], (2008).
American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry Council on Clinical Affairs: Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and young
permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent, 30, 175-183.
4.- Forsberg & Tedestam, (1993). Etiological and predisposing factors related to traumatic injuries to permanent teeth.
Swedish dental journal, 17(5), 183-190.
5.- Andreasen & Ravn, (1972). Epidemiology of traumatic dental injuries to primary and permanent teeth in a Danish
population sample. International journal of oral surgery, 1(5), 235-239.
6.- Andreasen, (1993).Textbook and color atlas of traumatic injuries to the teeth, 3rd ed. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 216–256.
7.- Arapostathis et al., (2006). A modified technique on the reattachment of permanent tooth fragments following dental
trauma. Case report. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 30(1), 29-34.
8.- De Blanco, (1996). Treatment of crown fractures with pulp exposure. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral
Radiology, and Endodontology, 82(5), 564-568.
9.- Cavalleri & Zerman, (1995). Traumatic crown fractures in permanent incisors with immature roots: a follow‐up study.
Dental Traumatology, 11(6), 294-296.
10.-Ojeda et al., (2011). Reattachment of anterior teeth fragments using a modified Simonsen’s technique after dental
trauma: report of a case. Dental Traumatology, 27(1), 81-85.
11.- Keinan et al., (2013). Applying extrusive orthodontic force without compromising the obturated canal space. The Journal
of the American Dental Association, 144(8), 910-913.
12.-Stockwell, (1988). Incidence of dental trauma in the Western Australian school dental service. Community dentistry and
oral epidemiology, 16(5), 294-298.
13.- Andreasen, (1970). Etiology and pathogenesis of traumatic dental injuries A clinical study of 1,298 cases. European Journal
of Oral Sciences, 78(1‐4), 329-342.
14.- Spinas & Altana, (2002). A new classification for crown fractures of teeth. The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 26(3),
225-231.
15.- Ellis & Davey, (1970). The classification and treatment of injuries to the teeth of children: a reference manual for the dental
student and the general practitioner. Year Book Medical Publishers.
16.- Ingber, (1989). Forced eruption: alteration of soft tissue cosmetic deformities. The International journal of periodontics &
restorative dentistry, 9(6), 416-425.
17.- Pontoriero et al., (1987). Rapid extrusion with fiber resection: a combined orthodontic-periodontic treatment modality.
The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry, 7(5), 30-43.
18.- May et al., (2013). Contemporary management of horizontal root fractures to the permanent dentition: diagnosis—
radiologic assessment to include cone-beam computed tomography. Pediatric dentistry, 35(2), 120-124.
19.- Bondemark et al., (1997). Attractive magnets for orthodontic extrusion of crown-root fractured teeth. American journal of
orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 112(2), 187-193.
20.- Sönmez et al., (2008). Orthodontic extrusion of a traumatically intruded permanent incisor: a case report with a 5‐year
follow up. Dental Traumatology, 24(6), 691-694.
21.- Saito et al., (2009). Management of a complicated crown‐root fracture using adhesive fragment reattachment and
orthodontic extrusion. Dental Traumatology, 25(5), 541-544.
22.- Grossman, (1966). Intentional replantation of teeth reimplantation. Asociación J Am Dent, 72 (5): 1111-8. doi: 10.14219 / jada.
archive.1966.0125.
23.- Kumar et al., (2019). Management of subgingival root fracture with decoronation and orthodontic extrusion in
mandibular dentition: A report of two cases. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry, 10(3), 554.
ODONTOLOGÍA VITALP. 76
Revista Odontología Vital
No. 38, Vol 1, 69-76 2023 I ISSN:2215-5740
24.- Campbell et al., (1975). Orthodontically corrected midline diastemas: A histologic study and surgical procedure. American
journal of orthodontics, 67(2), 139-158.
25.- Carvalho et al., (2006). Orthodontic extrusion with or without circumferential supracrestal fiberotomy and root planing.
International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 26(1), 87-93.
26.- Bach et al., (2004). Orthodontic extrusion: periodontal considerations and applications. Journal (Canadian Dental
Association), 70(11), 775-780.
27.- Edwards, (1988). A long-term prospective evaluation of the circumferential supracrestal fiberotomy in alleviating
orthodontic relapse. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 93(5), 380-387.
28.- Brain, (1969). The effect of surgical transsection of free gingival fibers on the regression of orthodontically rotated teeth
in the dog. American journal of orthodontics, 55(1), 50-70.
29.- Durham et al., (2004). Rapid forced eruption: a case report and review of forced eruption techniques. General dentistry,
52(2), 167-75.
30.- Suprabha et al., (2006). Reattachment and Orthodontic Extrusion in the management 9f an incisor crown-root fracture:
A case report. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 30(3), 211-214.
31.- Jorgensen & Nowzari, (2001). Aesthetic crown lengthening. Periodontology 2000, 27(1), 45-58.
32.- Yoshinuma et al., (2009). Orthodontic extrusion with palatal circumferential supracrestal fiberotomy improves facial
gingival symmetry: a report of two cases. Journal of Oral Science, 51(4), 651-654.
33.- Gonçalves et al., (2015). A mixed-model study assessing orthodontic tooth extrusion for the reestablishment of biologic
width. A systematic review and exploratory randomized trial. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 35.
34.- Simon et al., (1978). Extrusion of endodontically treated teeth. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 97(1), 17-23.
35.- Farmakis, (2018). Orthodontic extrusion of an incisor with a complicated crown root fracture, utilising a custom-made
intra-canal wire loop and endodontic treatment: a case report with 7-years follow-up. European Archives of Paediatric
Dentistry, 19(5), 379-385.